A tale of two storms: mainland emergency reporting and the Hong Kong media freeze

By David Bandurski and Joseph Cheng — The scale of China’s biggest breaking news story so far this year is positively epic. Regional snowstorms have stranded millions of travelers, left scores dead and chilled the national economy. Here in blustery Hong Kong, though, newspapers seem far more preoccupied this week with a “storm” of sex and celebrity that has whirled out of the icy thin air of local Internet chat rooms.

Mainland news coverage has been far from ideal, and Hong Kong news choices haven’t been entirely profane. Nevertheless, coverage this week is a disappointing study in contrasts.


[ABOVE: Combined image of front page coverage on January 29 in Hong Kong’s Apple Daily (left) and Guangzhou’s Southern Metropolis Daily (right).]

Let’s look first at mainland media coverage this week.

Chinese media, as ever under the watchful eye of party propaganda discipline, have met the snowstorm story head on with non-stop coverage (and so far no hints of information suppression at the national and provincial levels).

Predictably, we’ve seen familiar strains of government mobilization and official image crafting [Reuters coverage of here]. And there is certainly not enough reporting and criticism on the issue of government preparedness. Since national leaders mobilized action earlier this week, the critical tones have more or less submerged. One notable exception is an editorial in yesterday’s issue of Caijing magazine (more below). [CMP coverage of earlier criticism].

Some mainland commentators, including journalists, have said that now is the time for action and not for criticism. They have a point, of course, in being concerned first and foremost with the welfare of the millions stranded across the country.

Still, emergency response efforts should not quiet media criticism. After all, when you see images of tens of thousands of PLA soldiers clearing away snow with only hand shovels, you might be stirred by this show of solidarity and self-sacrifice. But let’s face it, this has to raise serious questions about institutional readiness too.

That said, there has been a noticeable flood of news coverage of the snowstorms in the mainland media, and not all of it is slavishly in service of the government’s public image.

The front page of Guangdong’s Southern Metropolis Daily on Monday ran with a full-page photo of a sea of passengers at Guangzhou West Railway Station jostling with green-clad soldiers. The main headline read: “Beijing-Guangzhou train line will be tough to clear in the next 3-5 days.” Controls have been imposed at the city’s rail stations, the subhead tells us, and stranded passengers have already surpassed 500,000. A separate headline at the bottom of the page points us to an inside article dealing with the impact on the stock market.


[ABOVE: Frontpage of Southern Metropolis Daily, January 29, 2008]

The next day, front page coverage at Southern Metropolis Daily dealt with Premier Wen Jiabao’s apology on January 29 to passengers stranded at a rail station in Hunan, one of the provinces hardest hit.

Additional reports included information on the province-wide refunding of more than 500,000 train tickets, more than 14,000 passengers stranded at Guangzhou’ Baiyun International Airport, and the imminent clearing of the Beijing-Zhuhai Expressway.


[ABOVE: Frontpage of Southern Metropolis Daily, January 30, 2008]

Reports of the disaster on the newspaper’s inside pages covered a wide range of areas, from traffic and weather news to official announcements to personal stories.


[ABOVE: Page A10 of Southern Metropolis Daily, January 30, 2008, reporting on more than 10,000 passengers stranded at Guangzhou’s Baiyun International Airport.]

Beginning as early as January 26, newspapers across China set up special sections on the snowstorms.

As the disaster worsened the news focus turned to the relief effort. Shenzhen-based QQ.com announced a pact with seven other media to mobilize citizens for the local relief effort in Guangdong. Guangzhou Daily printed up special editions on the disaster providing up-to-date information on where people could go for food, shelter and other needs.

In an editorial run on its Website today, Caijing magazine essentially called the present winter crisis the first failed test of China’s law on emergency management (突发事件应对法律), which took effect two months ago.

Quoting one of the emergency law’s principal drafters, Tsinghua University professor Yu An (于安), the magazine said that the law mandated that “relevant departments should declare a state of emergency in affected regions or areas at the earliest opportunity” and that “local governments should put response and relief structures in place and institute warning systems”.

This did not happen in recent weeks. Rather, emergency efforts did not roll into play until national leaders at the State Council held an emergency session on January 27, more than two weeks after unusual snowstorms caused havoc in local areas. The model of response, in other words, was still far too centralized.

The dissection of Hong Kong’s role in snowstorm coverage is unfortunately a simple procedure.

As snowstorms crippled China this week, Hong Kong media were obsessed with photographs of questionable authenticity depicting alleged sexual acts involving Hong Kong pop idols Edison Chen, Gillian Chung and Bobo Chan.

With the exception of South China Morning Post coverage, Ming Pao and some television coverage in Chinese (by the likes of ATV), attention has lingered on the photo scandal.


[ABOVE: Frontpage of Hong Kong’s Apple Daily, January 29, 2008.]

Wasn’t this a simple question of relevance? Did storms to the north actually have any measurable impact on the lives of Hong Kong residents?


There is the affect on the stock exchange. There are thousands of Hong Kong residents stranded in China. Air traffic in and out of the city has been directly affected. Hong Kong manufacturers will also no doubt feel the bite.

Was the story interesting enough to make the front page?


The images emerging from China this week were arresting. The numbers were staggering. The human, institutional and political dimensions of the story were engaging and important.

Nevertheless, as millions of travelers were stranded across China on Tuesday, including more than 800,000 rail passengers in nearby Guangzhou alone, the headline splashed across the front page of Hong Kong’s Apple Daily read: “‘Explicit photos’ of Edison Chen and Gillian Chung exposed.”

“The storm broke at around 8pm on the evening before yesterday,” the Apple Daily reported (translation from ESWN). “A netizen posted a photograph of a man and a woman in bed at the Hong Kong Discussion Forum. These two bore some resemblance to Edison Chen and Gillian Chung.”

“Naughty photos make it onto the Web,” declared the front page of Hong Kong’s Oriental Daily, which gleefully included cropped versions of the photos under a banner advertisement for dried scallops.


[ABOVE: Frontpage coverage in Oriental Daily , January 29, 2008, of the photo scandal.]

The case is now a bit newsier. The focus has turned to the efforts of Hong Kong police to find those responsible for posting the photos to the Web. The images themselves have been played down a bit too (a natural process of fading reader interest?).

But one week into what will undoubtedly be one of the biggest breaking China news stories of 2008, Hong Kong’s major newspapers are still yammering on about Edison Chen, Gillian Chung & Co. The story dominated the space above the fold on yesterday’s Apple Daily, with the headline, “Police begin mass round-up of photo posters”:


[ABOVE: Frontpage of yesterday’s Apply Daily.]

At other major papers yesterday treatment was much the same [See Roland Soong’s round-up at ESWN]. The only notable exception was Ming Pao, which placed the photo scandal on page two and avoided sensational images (the paper’s leading story was about the Macau corruption trial of former planning minister Ao Man-long).

One of the key tests of mainland news coverage will come in the next few days and weeks, as the immediate priorities of disaster relief diminish. How will Chinese media look back on the snowstorms of 2008? To what extent will they address such issues as institutional readiness?

It’s not too soon to say, however, that Hong Kong media have fallen short.

As journalists in China struggle for greater rights, neighboring Hong Kong should serve as example of the possibilities offered by free expression. This week’s pathetic showing must leave mainland journalists wondering, “Is that the kind of press a free market pays for?”

Does Hong Kong deserve a better press? Should Hong Kong residents be concerned about this issue? . . . These are certainly questions the SAR should talk a great deal more about once the madness of these storms has been cleared away.

[Posted February 1, 2008, 2:31am HK]

QQ.com Special Page on the Snowstorms, soliciting comments from eyewitnesses
Hunan’s RedNet Feature Page on Snowstorms
China makes martyrs of three killed in storm,” AP, January 31, 2008
Snow and chaos,” Danwei.org, January 29, 2008
Newspaper editorial calls for greater information openness to combat snowstorm woes,” CMP, January 29, 2008

7 Comments to “A tale of two storms: mainland emergency reporting and the Hong Kong media freeze”

  1. […] entry can be found here and here; A comparison of the front pages of GZ and HK newspapers is here; Fallout from the way the HK Police handled the event here). I can see the reason why they cover […]

  2. Dani says:

    A photographer and myself have been in front of the Guangzhou train station yesterday. It was really amazing to see all that people trying to get into the train, although I have to say that everything was more or less under control.

    We have uploaded some videos (http://www.youtube.com/user/superdani1982) and pictures (http://www.flickr.com/photos/pakintosh/sets/72157603841328856/).

    I have also some information in Spanish on my blog.

  3. […] to mollify the crowds the effects will linger for a while.Update:Don’t miss David Bandurski’s roundup of Chinese media coverage of the situation, plus his comparison with what the Hong Kong media spent its time on last […]

  4. […] Anyhow, via Danwei- more war on snow coverage here. […]

  5. […] what are the consequences? We’ll chat more in future workshops. Please also take a look at this article written by members of the CMP at the […]

  6. Lao Fu Tzu says:

    Lament for a Colonial People

    by Lao Fu Tzu

    (Published February 1, 2008)

    Hongkongers prides themselves from being different. It is Chinese, but not quite. Cantonese, but not quite Guangdong Ren.

    What Hongkong has historically prided themselves for is their generosity to those around them – from giving shelter to their compatriots when China was in turmoil, to aiding less than deserving Vietnamese refugees, to providing aid for Tsunami victims recently.

    As one of the, if not the wealthiest city in China, it has an automatic obligation to help its less fortunate brethrens. Likewise, there is a reciprocal obligation from China to Hong Kong.

    Wasn’t it just a few weeks ago, when the Chief Executive had to seek the assistance of Beijing for as trivial issue as continued access to low cost flour when China placed export controls on food?

    Didn’t Hongkong complain loudly about insufficient supplies of inexpensive Chinese pork?

    Isn’t Hongkong lobbying hard for privileges from China like allowing individual investors to invest in Hongkong listed stocks?

    Don’t Hongkong enjoy extraordinary privileges like paying no taxes to the central government?

    Isn’t it a fact that Hongkong contributes nothing toward the defense of China?

    Aren’t many of these privileges given to no other place in China?

    Was it that long ago that China sent millions of free spending tourist to Hongkong to help a lagging economy?

    If Hongkong is to enjoy these extraordinary privileges, shouldn’t Hongkong be generous to its countrymen when they are in need?

    Didn’t Hongkong companies prospered from the availability of inexpensive migrant laborers willing to work in factories located in Guangdong?

    Hongkong’s obligations as a loyal citizen of China are self evident historically.

    Remember the glory days when Hongkongers financed Dr. Sun Yat Sen and the first efforts to establish a modern government in China?

    Yet, somewhere along the way, Hongkong’s sense of obligation to China, to its home province of Guangdong, to its many migrant workers in Hongkong owned / controlled enterprises in China seem to have been conveniently forgotten even as Hongkongers donate millions to aid foreign victims of the Tsunami.

    Let’s look at what Hongkong could have done for China during the past few weeks:

    – Hongkong could have sent relief supplies and distributed them to the tens of thousands of people camped out in the cold, without shelter, food, water, sanitary facilities.

    – Simple things like tents, sleeping bags, portable stoves, food, clean water, portable toilets. Things that Hongkong has available or can import on short notice from agencies like the Red Cross that stockpile them.

    – Hongkong could have set up field kitchens and provided everyone with food and drink.

    – Hongkong could have organized convoys of supplies to Guangdong (with the HK detachment of the PLA providing an escort), and have Hongkong civil servants and relief workers distribute them.

    – Hongkong medical staff could have been sent to set up free clinics for anyone who fell ill waiting in the cold and wet.

    – Hongkong controlled / owned companies could have offered to permit their employees to return to the dormitories, provided transportation, and permit them to reschedule their vacation at another time and offered their workers compensation for

    – Hongkong linemen could have been sent to China to help restore power to the areas hard hit by down power lines

    – Hongkong police and immigration officers could have been offered to Guangdong to help them maintain order

    – Hongkong could have flown in relief supplies (like food, supplies, generators and fuel) to other cities in Central China.

    All these actions assume that Beijing and the local authority will permit and welcome aid from Hongkong. Nothing suggest that they would decline such aid or block its distribution.

    Instead of all these real, substantive actions , what was actually done was a belated call, issued around January 29, by a Hongkong business association to ask their members to reopen dorms for their workers.

    Thanks a lot – they couldn’t even get a consensus among their members to agree to such an action before they publically asked them.

    The bottom line is that Hongkong did nothing to help China in its time of need.

    Is it unfair to conclude that HK entire governing elite have an ill developed sense of reciprocal obligation to China? Patriotism, in Beijing’s terms.

    Reciprocity is the heart and soul of relationships not only between individuals, groups, but also peoples and nations.

    Hongkong’s failure during China’s moment of need will, perhaps, not be remembered by many. Just the same, there will be no positive memories, which form a reservoir of goodwill that Hongkong can draw on when its moment of need arise.

    This failure of Hongkong to recognize its reciprocal obligations to China, to Guangdong, to its own factories, its own contractors, its own migrant workforce, is a disaster for Hongkong.

    It is a moral failure, an ethical failure, a failure of the imagination, and above all, a failure to recognize that Hongkong is a part of China, and as such, it must share the good times, and the bad with its homeland.

    Presiden Hu and Premier Wen made a powerful statement when he visited with those affected by the calamity and took responsibility for organizing relief.

    Donald Tsang and Legco could have made a similarly powerful statement that they share the pain of their countrymen.

    Sadly, one must conclude that Hongkongers are still, at heart, a colonial people who is dependent on Beijing or a higher authority to guide it to do the right thing.

    The opportunity to make a contribution to China during this moment of need, fortunately, has not passed.

    China still suffersfrom dire power shortages, food price inflation, and the continued disruption caused by the winter storm.

    For example, Hongkong can offer to collectively reduce their consumption of electricity so that as much as possible of the surplus can be exported to Guangdong.

    Ah Tsang, will you step up to the plate and see if Hongkong people can change their ways?

    PS to Donald Tsang: Forget about being Patriotic. It is about Hongkong’s self interest to make more friends in China.

  7. […] that’s it. See the China Media Project for further analysis of recent mainland media coverage of the bad weather and paralyzed […]

Leave a Comment